Smartphone touch-screen test puts the iPhone ahead

By Julian Prokaza on Tue 12 January 2010

MOTO Labs has published the results of an interesting test that shows the difference in accuracy and sensitivity between the touch-sensitive displays on a handful of leading smartphones.

The test involved slowly drawing diagonal lines across the screen with a fingertip in a drawing app and MOTO Labs (no relation to Motorola) tried four smartphones — the Apple iPhone, HTC Droid Eris, Motorola Droid (Milestone in the UK) and Google Nexus One. All use capacitive touch-screens, but not all use multi-touch (which wasn’t part of the test, anyway).

MOTO Labs performed two tests — one with light finger pressure and one with medium finger pressure. Accurate tracking of a slow-moving contact point is much more difficult than a fast moving one, which is why it’s easier to draw a straight line with a mouse in a drawing application by moving it quickly. Applying light pressure to a touch-screen makes tracking harder still, since the screen must be sensitive enough to detect the feather-light touch of a fingertip.

The MOTO Labs results photo shows screen on the four phones for both tests — straight lines area sign of an accurate, sensitive touch-screen, while wavy lines are not.

The iPhone came out on top in both tests, although wavy lines at the screen edges indicate that the display’s sensitivity isn’t uniform across its entire expanse. The other three smartphones didn’t fare quite so well, with light finger pressure confusing all of them into producing wriggly lines.

If it seems like a silly test, it’s worth bearing in mind that accuracy and sensitivity are of utmost importance for a small touch-screen that’s designed to be used with a finger. Clicking links on a web page that’s viewed full size, for example, can mean aiming for an area that’s just a few pixels across and having to zoom into a page before you can accurately click its ‘Next’ button makes for a poor user experience.

[Moto Labs]

Comments


Comment 1
unhappy
motosurf95 12:18 on 13 Jan 2010

http://www.flickr.com/photos/42580856@N08/4264037413/

Report abuse


Comment 2
unhappy
Chris Putnam 17:52 on 13 Jan 2010

so what kind of scientific controls did you use to make sure the pressure, speed and other variables involved remained constant across all tests? was the application code exactly the same on iphone vs android (obviously not). Anyway this is a stupid test that neither concludes or demonstrates anything.

Report abuse


Comment 3
neutral
Administrator | registered | 5 posts 12:15 on 15 Jan 2010

We didn't perform the test, Chris — Moto Labs did. Since fingers were used rather than some automated device, pressure, speed and uniform motion are all variables that could have influenced the results, but assuming the tester tried to keep these all equal, this is still an interesting (though not conclusive) test.

Report abuse


Add your comment now

Post a reply to this thread

 

Please describe your emotions in making this comment:


Powered by reCAPTCHA

Unless you are a verified user, comments will be moderated before they appear. Comments submitted entirely in capital letters, containing advertising or excessive swearing will be rejected; please try to be polite. The best comments are relevant, factual and balanced; think about all aspects of the package, such as speed, connection quality and customer service. We reserve the right to edit comments.