We ran our standard set of application benchmarks on the Eee PC 901 – a series of timed sequential tests that convert a number of WAV files to MP3 using dbPowerAmp, edit a number of images in Corel Paint Shop Pro X and render some video footage in TMPGEnc. The final test runs all three programs at once in order to asses the laptop's multi-application performance.

The base score in our tests is 100% – that's what a desktop PC with an AMD Athlon 3500+ processor and 1Gb of DDR2 RAM achieves. In other words, the higher the benchmark result, the better. We’ve also included the scores for a Lenovo ThinkPad X61s (1.6GHz Core 2 Duo, 2Gb RAM) for a more meaningful comparison.

The Eee PC 901 overall score in our benchmarks was 40%, compared to the Eee PC 900’s score of 36%. – not much of an improvement given the Atom's much higher clock speed. This is an aggregate score for all four tests though, and while the MP3, image-editing and video-editing tests all showed a similar incremental increase, the multi-application score was dramatically better – 37% compared to the 10% of the Eee PC 900.

We performed two battery tests, both with the screen set to 50% brightness and both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth disabled. The light use test simply pages through a text file in Internet Explorer and gives a ‘best case’ battery life; the heavy use test runs the multiple application benchmark repeatedly and is perhaps a more realistic measure of how long the battery will typically last.

The Eee PC 901 lasted for five and a half just over eight hours in the light use test and four hours 32 minutes in the heavy use test. Both figures are extremely impressive, but it's worth bearing in mind that the Intel Atom chip drops to 1200MHz/700MHz by default on battery power. This won't make much difference to web browsing, word processing and other non-demanding tasks, though.

It's also worth noting that while the Eee PC 901 is actively cooled (we suspect with the same fan as the Eee PC 900, judging by the barely audible fan noise), it doesn't get anywhere near as warm. The 900 gets toasty to the touch even when it's just sitting there doing nothing, while the underside of the 901 was barely above room temperature even when it was running our demanding multi-application test.

The Eee PC 901 is the first Intel Atom-powered device we've reviewed and we're relatively impressed. The performance gains are small (though Hyper-Threading makes a clear difference), but then raw power isn't what the netbook concept is all about. Battery life comparisons with the Eee PC 900 and its 4400mAh cell are difficult, but some rough calculations based on its battery life and battery capacity suggest that the Intel Atom in the Eee PC 901 does make a difference to power consumption, particularly when the processor is being pushed.

Given that the Eee PC 900 was only on sale for a couple of months, some owners are bound to feel a little aggrieved by the 901's slightly lower price and much higher capacity battery, but that's progress for you. To be fair, the Intel Atom hardy blows the Celeron-M away, but we must admit that the 6600mAh is nice to have, even though it adds a few hundred grammes to the weight.

[Related: See all Mobile Computer netbook reviews to date]

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (10)

What speed Processor?
written by Adam Elphick , June 16, 2008

Hey Jules, What speed was the processor running when those tests were done? All previous benchmarks on the Atom 1.6 showed it less capable than the Celeron M on many things - for example poeple said the Celeron would be better for gaming.... Maybe Asus sent it to you 'overclocked'? Just a thought. Lucky this time at least they confirm the battery WILL be 6600 - I wonder if that is the 'Global standard' like the 5800 was supposed to be for the 900! Ha ha

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

How hot it runs?
written by Fixup , June 16, 2008

One thing I don't like about new laptops: they run hot and noisy. How's the 901 on these regards? I have not seen any review mentioned these yet.

These aspects are far more concerned than how fast it runs.

For now I stick to IBM X20, it is sooo cold and quiet!!!

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

...
written by James G. DuPuy , June 16, 2008

Nothing was said about the Bluetooth. It is suppose to have bluetooth. I assumed it could then use wireless headphones, and get files from my PDA. Maybe touch on this next time. I plan to get the Linex model. I have a 900 now. Wil likely leave it at work and keep the 901 at home.

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

...
written by Julian Prokaza , June 16, 2008

This is at the stock 1.6GHz, Adam. We haven't been able to test overclocked & underclocked performance yet - there are no Windows XP drivers. I'll update the review with this info as soon as I can.

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

Bluetooth
written by Adam Elphick , June 16, 2008

Hey Jules - have you been 'inside' the machine? We 900 guys really need to know what the bluetooth module is and a high res shot of the components atatched around the BT-connector - as I suspect it is teh same bluetooth module that the original 900 in teh FCC application had ( https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=940941&fcc_id='MSQEPC9GE780' )see internal pictures.
Thanks

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

Why did you remove the Sizeasy logo?
written by saab_rider , June 20, 2008

You post this image:


and you remove sizeasy's logo (www.sizeasy.com). They make it easy for you to compare sizes of different objects, create the images for you, allow you to distribute them freely, and ask you only not to remove their logo! and you do exactly that!

images

Feel free to copy the images from this page and use them in websites, reports, blogs, wherever you like. We do ask that you make the image a link and use the permalink (created above) as the target url when possible. Please do not remove the logo from the bottom of the images.

Very uncool

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

...
written by Steffen , June 20, 2008

Ist the display LED backlit display?

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

price confusion - please help!
written by tomer , July 08, 2008

Hey Jules,I steel don't get it...
the price you noted was £319=$500 (lower than the $550 of the Eee 900 - as you said -"...aggrieved by the 901's slightly lower price..."),even though, everywhere i looked (amazon for example),the price of the 901 is $600 while only $550 for the 900. did i miss something? :roll:
Thanks

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

...
written by John Taylor , August 30, 2008

When is the Windows XP version of the 901 available to purchase?

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

...
written by Adam Hansen , December 18, 2008

The people who run this website have not removed the sizezy logo from the image if you look carefully.

report abuse

vote down

vote up

Votes: +0

---

Bookmark with: